AYODHYA VERDICT JUDGEMENT PDF

0 Comments

Ayodhya verdict in Supreme Court LIVE Updates: A bench-headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra had reserved the verdict on July Ayodhya verdict updates: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in a majority judgement that the mosque-namaz case need not be referred to. Ayodhya Case: The Supreme Court verdict ended with majority, Justice Ashok Bhushan, who read out the judgement for himself and the.

Author: Shakak Tojalabar
Country: Brazil
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 5 February 2010
Pages: 37
PDF File Size: 18.9 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.26 Mb
ISBN: 228-9-73749-590-4
Downloads: 90126
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardazilkree

Hence, it must be reconsidered by a larger bench, he.

Live updates: Supreme Court refuses to refer Ayodhya land dispute case to a larger bench

Bakker has named the five temples as follows: A similar suit was filed shortly after but later withdrawn by Paramhans Das of Ayodhya. It says observation was made on acquisition and not Islam religion. Quote Questionable observation of verdict has permeated into Allahabad High Court’s decision in land dispute case Justice Nazeer. During the reign of Baburthe first Mughal emperor, some have claimed that an old Hindu temple was demolished, and a mosque constructed at the same place in Ayodhya and named after Babur.

Dhavan persisted that it was necessary to reconsider observations in Ismail Farooqi judgment that praying in mosque was not an essential feature of Islam, as that the impugned judgment of the High Court had relied on such observations. Communal riots across India followed.

Supreme Court Ayodhya verdict: SC refuses to refer Ayodhya land dispute case to a larger bench

Earlier, Hindu groups had opposed the plea of their Muslim counterparts that the verdict holding that a mosque was not integral to the prayers offered by the followers jkdgement Islam be referred to a larger bench.

  DIBUJO TRIDIMENSIONAL ANDREW LOOMIS PDF

The older editions of Abdul Ghaffar’s book contain more detail, which seems to have been excised in the edition. The land was declared to be under dispute, and the gates remained locked.

Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid case. It would have been better if this issue was referred to Constitutional bench. Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the UP jjdgement, had said this dispute has been awaiting final adjudication for “almost a century”.

The Supreme Court had laid down a law in its judgment in Ismail Faruqui v. A police cordon placed there to protect the mosque was heavily outnumbered.

Retrieved 20 June A fourth suit was filed by the Muslim Central Board of Wakf for declaration and possession of the site. The title suit case would only arise after this challenge is cleared by the seven judge bench. The majority judgement today says that the observations by the Supreme Court were only related to that specific issue of acquisition, and not to the larger question of whether a mosque is essential to Islam.

A three-judge bench of the apex court will commence hearing on Ayodhya land dispute in the week starting from October In Buddha’s time B. Three months after being constituted, the Liberhan Commission began investigations into who and what led to the demolition of the Babri Mosque.

The Muslim parties wanted the ruling to be reconsidered by a five-judge bench. The Muslim parties to the title suit said the ruling prejudiced their claim.

However a new notice issued by the top court said that Justice Nazeer will also pronounce his opinion.

In Julyterrorists attacked the makeshift temple at the site of the destroyed mosque. The two-judge bench of Supreme Court remarked that the High Court ruling was surprising as no party wanted a split of the site.

  EVONIK IPO PROSPECTUS PDF

Ayodhya and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Essays in Early Indian History. Many ayodhua a judgement in favour of the Hindu parties before the general elections could go in the favour of the Bharatiya Janata Party BJP which had hudgement construction of the Ram Temple in its manifesto. Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the UP government, had said this dispute has been awaiting final adjudication for “almost a century”.

The issue had cropped up when a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra was hearing the batch of appeals filed against the Allahabad High Court’s verdict by which the disputed land on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid area was divided in three parts. Darul Musannifin Shibli Academy.

Ayodhya Verdict Live Updates: Supreme Court Refuses To Refer Ayodhya-Linked Case To 5-Judge Bench

In ruling by the Supreme Court came in a case related to acquisition of land in and around the Babri Masjid. Ghaghara Gomti Choti Saryu.

The clamour for building a Ram temple was growing. Which way this decision goes will be closely watched by parties across the political spectrum. Ijaz Maqbool, lawyer for the Petitioner, says Muslim community always said it is only a land dispute and it has to be dealt with accordingly. Both sides to the dispute filed civil suits. Archived from the original on 30 September Land Belongs To Judgemeny Ram: Foul language Slanderous Inciting hatred against a certain community Others.